Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed

Ann Coulter at GOProud’s “Homocon” last night: “Once they find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted”


(Cross-posted from Good As You)

By Jeremy Hooper

Saturday night at GOProud’s “HomoCon” fundraiser in NYC, Ann Coulter reportedly (and predictably) said this nugget of whatever-ness to a room full of gay people:

Marriage “is not a civil right – you’re not black,” Coulter said to nervous laughter. She went on to note that gays are among the wealthiest demographic groups in the country.

“Blacks must be looking at the gays saying, ‘Why can’t we be oppressed like that?’”

*MORE: They’re gay, conservative and proud [Politico]

But despite how thoroughly tiresome the act seems like it’d be for the performer at this point, Ms. C apparently didn’t limit her bizarre need to jib and jab her way through any and every speech at just the above marriage comments. Journalist Megan Carpentier tweeted these other charming takeaways from her vantage point on site:

Coulter: the gays “ought to start being antiabortion because “once they find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted”

Coulter now on about pre-marital sex, “fisting in schools” and liberals who “aren’t really gay they just hate dad” #homocon

Ann Coulter, “I happen to be religious.” She then parrots the pro-Prop 8 arguments that failed at trial. #homocon

@megancapentier [Twitter]

6A00D8341C503453Ef0133F2E32117970B-1Offensive quips passed off as jokes? Shock value? An odd need to divide rather than unite? Uh huh. So basically it sounds like GOProud got the exact Ann Coulter that they sought: One who as a pundit makes a good agitator/performance artist, and who as a gay activist makes a good, uhm — reason to stay home and watch this week’s DVRed “Modern Family” episode instead?

But hey, such is GOProud’s organizational right, making bookings like these. All going up against the reality of GOProud’s political right: A movement that still uses words like “traditional marriage” and still votes in a unanimous senatorial block against DADT repeal.



  • 1. Vaati  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:27 am

    I think she is a Cannibal Troll.

  • 2. Sagesse  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:30 am

    They invited Ann Coulter… they got Ann Coulter.

  • 3. Ann S.  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:31 am

    I can't imagine why they invited her and paid her (no doubt) ridiculously high fee, only to have her insult them. Masochism?

  • 4. Lesbians Love Boies  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:33 am

    I have no opinion! Just subscribing.

  • 5. Alan E  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:47 am

    Exactly! Who the hell did they think she was going to be? She is very good at staying on her message, and she was on her own game, as offensive as her drivel is. I really wish that many of those who have a large following to eat up filth like hers were on thewitness stand as examples of animus.

  • 6. Kathleen  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:52 am

    And me.

  • 7. AndrewPDX  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:01 am

    Seriously… with all their total failures, GOProud is worse for gay rights than NARTH.

    Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

  • 8. DebbieC  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:03 am

    The sad thing is – this

    the gays “ought to start being antiabortion because “once they find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted”

    is closer to being true than any of us would like to believe or admit.

  • 9. Matt  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:05 am

    @DebbieC, sadly I think you're dead on with this.

  • 10. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:05 am

    Finally, they're being honest about this. I've been saying all along that their anti-choice stand would only go as far as gay fetuses.

  • 11. Ann S.  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:10 am

    Is there a disagreement between GOProud and LCR? Why haven't they joined forces? Anyone know?

  • 12. BK  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:25 am


    That comment is completely realistic, though. That's what makes it so offensive and scary. So if they discover a "gay gene" some time, what is to prevent people from aborting gay babies, or from labeling us as genetic defects? It seems to be something to fear.

  • 13. BK  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:37 am

    I just logged off, but then had another thought: most people who are vehemently against equality are usually deeply religious. Is that correct according to our current knowledge? Because then they would be against abortion, but also against gays. Kinda stuck. Just food for thought. See you all (and your comments!) in the morning.

  • 14. Chris B  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:37 am

    Ann S.: Just stumbled across this on

    "Perhaps the greatest difference between Log Cabin national, as it was from my initial involvement in 1995 through the leadership of Patrick Guerriero in the middle part of the first decade of the current century and GOProud is that it often seemed the former organization was always apologizing for being Republican — as if that partisan affiliation were something to be ashamed about — while the latter group has showed a real pride in being conservative.

    They get that we don’t need change what it means to be conservative to show that one can be both conservative and gay. They understand what true conservatives have long understood, there is no inherent contradictions between being conservative and gay. At least since the rise of the modern right, with the nomination of Barry Goldwater as the GOP’s standard bearer in 1964, through the nomination and election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 to the Contract with America in 1994 and the growth of grassroots protest against big government (AKA the Tea Party) in the past year, American conservatism is based on the idea (and ideal) of freedom."

  • 15. icapricorn  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:37 am

    Right, this speaks more to the unserious — and suspect? — nature of GoProud. They're motivated by something, but it certainly isn't gay rights. The phrase "useful idiots" comes to mind. Perhaps the nervous laughter in the audience was the first glimmer of realization for some of our conservative brothers and sisters that they are being duped and used.

  • 16. Bill  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:41 am

    Stay classy, Coulter.

  • 17. icapricorn  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:54 am

    You know, if they have the technology to discover such a specific gene, (and it's more likely to be a whole constellation of genes, some of which may be tied in with highly desirable attributes ) they will have the technology to discover a lot of other sorts of gene constellations. Birth selection will explode with a whole set of ethical-legal questions.

    We're conjecturing about a futuristic world that may never be and that most likely will evolved along with its technology. Birth selection ethics, at first ham-handed, will probably become increasingly sophisticated and aware. Also, it is more than probable that a gay child may not elicit the same perceived disadvantages as one perhaps does now.

    At this point, the question is theoretical, and actually none of our business. It will be the challenge for another generation in another time — if it will be at all.

  • 18. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:00 am

    Did anyone else miss this story? Another Pray the Gay Away pastor accussed of sleeping with young men.

  • 19. Michelle Evans  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:10 am

    There was a short-lived TV show several years ago called Century City. I hesitate to call it a science fiction show, but it was set in the future. But there were no rocket packs and flying cars. The purpose of the show was to look at laws that might be coming to a courtroom near you sometime in the future. It was a great way to examine social questions that we are now facing.

    One episode specifically dealt with the idea that a couple discovered that their yet to be born son was going to be gay, and they had to figure out how to deal with the situation–should he be aborted, should he be "fixed" in the womb, that sort of thing. It was a very moving episode, as were many of the cases they tried. I was very disappointed when the show ended after only about 8 episodes. Glad I have them all archived.

    (And yes, they came to terms with the fact that he would be gay, and allowed their son to be born and live just as he was.)

  • 20. Michelle Evans  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:14 am

    Yes, I saw that story. It's becoming so common that most people don't even notice anymore. Can't wait for the day when they find our megachurch pastor Rick Warren from right down the street here, to be in bed with someone from

    Bill Maher even commented on this on his show Friday, and reiterated that anyone out there rallying against gays like this jerk was doing, is not probably gay, he IS gay!

  • 21. MJFargo  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:21 am

    Yes. She really lifts up the Spirit, no? I really thought she'd been barred from the country, but remember now that was Paris Hlton from Japan. Pity.

  • 22. Aaron  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:41 am

    i find myself wondering if this type of stuff could be used as evidence of ANIMUS. when they say shit like this, can't we use it to prove animus?

  • 23. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:51 am

    What I like about this one is it's a LAWSUIT…which means either depositions, etc., or a big fat out-of-court settlement. The young men were 17 and 18 years old.

    Though I'm not religious, myself, something that was pointed out in the documentary Deliver Us from Evil is that not only are these parrishoners sexually abused, but since their abuser is a religious leader, their faith is abused, as well. Which is very sad. It's hard enough trying to find some sort of peace with "god" without your pastor drawing you into sex.

  • 24. Richard A. Walter (s  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:52 am

    Yes. Will read more later.

  • 25. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:54 am

    This is also the church Martin Luther King, Jr.'s granddaughter (?) belongs to. Together they lead a march to MLK's grave in honor of "traditional marriage".

  • 26. Straight Ally #3008  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:10 am

    Speaking as a scientist, I can assure you there is no one "gay gene." There is certainly a genetic component, and more broadly, sexual orientation is a biological trait, but like most things is biology our inherent qualities result from a vast network of interactions. But then again, Ann Coulter doesn't believe in evolution, so you should never trust her opinions on science ever, ever, ever.

  • 27. Regan DuCasse  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:12 am

    If anything needs to be taken from the genetic confluence is the stupid gene, the evil gene…and a cure for schizophrenia would be nice.

    Nervous laughter at Ann Coulter's jabs at their expense?!

    It's one thing to be a gay republican conservative, it's another to invite someone to a media event that slaps your face, ridicules your struggles and shows no respect to the forum you gave her access to.
    She was being Ann Coulter alright.
    Doesn't mean gay people deserve her!

  • 28. Loren J. Lemos  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:18 am

    <blockquote cite="Marriage “is not a civil right – you’re not black,”

    gays “ought to start being antiabortion because “once they find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted”">

    Wait – so being gay isn't genetic, like being black, so gays don't get to marry – but it is genetic, so we need to repeal reproductive rights?

    This woman is fucking terrible.

  • 29. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:20 am

    Now that this is becoming a common phenom, we need a specific name for these tools who are virulently anti-gay in public while at the same time indulging their own homosexuality and expecting everyone to cover up for them. Suggestions?

  • 30. Straight Ally #3008  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:23 am

    You mean other than "megachurch preacher?" >;-D

  • 31. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:25 am

    Well, some of them were politicians, remember–

    and hey, how come you were issued a straight-ally number and I wasn't??? NO FAIR

  • 32. Don in Texas  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:26 am

    Ann Coulter is a despicable human being with no credibility whatsoever.

    Yes, her insane utterances can be used as evidence of animus towards LGBT people. That animus is rooted in and promoted by "religious" individuals and organizations.

    Judge Walker pointed this out in his sweeping and eloquent decision.

  • 33. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:26 am

    "closet toad" just occurred to me, I don't know why–though both insulting to closets and toads, for some reason the image appeals to me.

  • 34. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:26 am

    It was in your Gay Agenda for Straight Allies packet, Elizabeth.

  • 35. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:27 am

    *rustles through paperwork* oh frack….I can never keep this stuff straight. Here's the wristband, is it on the wristband??

  • 36. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:29 am

    How 'bout pedophiles, since that's what they are. I never even think of this type of scum as gay or bi or anything else decent, 'cuz I don't think they are. They're just wanting to get whatever they can from wherever they can. And the younger the better.

  • 37. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:30 am

    Yes — it's also on the wristband, Elizabeth. Whew! Glad you found it.

  • 38. Kathleen  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:34 am

    Yes, please don't insult toads. My son's high school teams were the Toads.

  • 39. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:36 am

    Me too, I was starting to get worried my registration hadn't gone through the Central Agenda Office. Now, do you guys get a toaster oven for straight allies, or only for a complete conversion?

    As for closet toads, yeah, a lot of them are peds……though reputedly "Bishop" Eddie Long waited until his victims were the legal age of consent in Georgia (though the seduction apparently began years earlier.)

    And the Republican wonk who just came out, what's his face…..Mehlman–he wasn't either, was he? I hope he was at this GOProud event and I hope he got a lot of dirty looks.

  • 40. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:38 am

    @ Kathleen: really? and whoops, sorry! How about rats, or what's even more repulsive than rats??

  • 41. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:41 am

    No, we only get a thank you tweet from headquarters for allies. They save the toaster ovens for conversions only.

  • 42. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:50 am

    LOL@cockroach–and how they skitter for cover when the lights come on! Let's keep it!

    and Kate, sorry it was only a Tweet, but that'll keep up the incentive for the Agenda Missionaries out there knocking on doors for Teh Cawhz.

    That being said, I'm a little insulted that my conscription as a straight ally wasn't good for at least 10% off at SoupPlantation or something. :(

  • 43. rf  |  September 26, 2010 at 6:55 am

    Michaelangelo Signorile on Sirius played one of Eddie Long's sermons onn Friday where Long says gays deserve death – think the audio is here:

  • 44. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:01 am

    Would I be right in averring that the religious ones seem to be pedophiles moreso than the political ones? *trying to think back through the list of the h8ters who have been outed*

  • 45. rf  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:12 am

    weren't the kids 17-18? thats older than the age of consent in Georgia according to Carpool Cookie's link. plus I thought from Rob Tisanai's video that pedophilia had to do with prepubescent boys because of the lack of hair thing–that's why its really mostly straight identified men who commit pedophilia on boys (they have better access to boys usually and the younger boys are close enough to women/girls in body type). I could go along with labelling him a gay pedophile (seems rare) but the ages of the boys make me think he's gay.

  • 46. Don in Texas  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:21 am

    @ rf at #41: A true pedophile properly is classified as neither gay nor straight. He or she is a person sexually attracted to children. of either gender.

  • 47. rf  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:22 am

    Sadly, the stupid gene appears to be dominant.

  • 48. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:24 am

    I don't think there would not be many doctors who agreed to test for a "gay gene", and fewer who would arrange an abortion if it were detected.

    And as it will take a while to locate genetic markers like that, more and more of society will not be freaked out by gays, or the possibility of having a gay child.

    And what would the accuracy prediction be? Would parents abort their child if there was only a 55% chance the test were accurate? Mothers bond with the child they're carrying very early.

    I don't see this as a tangible threat.

  • 49. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:28 am


    But the syntax in my opening paragraph above might need a breathalizer test.

  • 50. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:30 am

    But haven't some neurologists pointed out some differences in the brains of conservatives v. liberals? though being a conservative isn't the same thing as being a bigmouth lying political tool.

    Gee, if we could only isolate the Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh gene….guess who's getting aborted, Ann?

  • 51. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Elizabeth: I understand that it was nothing personal, but they had huge budget cuts the last few years because of the Prop 8 fight. Maybe they'll be issuing superior premiums again once this all settles down.

  • 52. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Yep. Exactly what I said, too.

  • 53. rf  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:36 am

    Although they may not be classified as straight or gay, according to the study in Rob's video, it appears that the vast majority of pedophiles of both boys and girls are straight-identified. so in this sense, if the video is correct, a "gay" pedophile would be rare.

    I guess the question I would have is, is a pedophile actually sexually attracted to children or are they attracted to the access to and/or power over children that lets them play out whatever is going on in their head. Or are there both kinds? I am definitely no expert on this stuff.

  • 54. Ronnie  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:36 am

    Why is Ann Culter even relevant to world….sighs…. : / …Ronnie

  • 55. Lesbians Love Boies  |  September 26, 2010 at 7:42 am

    Carpool Cookie, I agree with you, I don't think of this as a threat. There might be some people who will look to see if a child is a boy or a girl and abort for the want of the other, but I seriously don't think people will look to see if a child might be gay or straight.

    Shallowness in some goes only so far, it's those people who shouldn't be parents. I actually think even the most homophobic would not even spend the money or time on something this absurd.

  • 56. AndrewPDX  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:03 am

    If you remember, the Plaintiffs called Tam as a witness of animus — even though he was originally going to be a Defense witness.

    No new evidence can be entered in this trial… but can the <del>amicus</del> animus briefs from Friday be used as evidence in some other case?

    Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

  • 57. Carol  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:06 am

    MLK was a terrific civil rights leader, but his affairs didn't exactly honor his "traditional" marriage, did they?

  • 58. Aaron  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:09 am

    right, but can't we get amici filed on our behalf pointing to this type of animus? i mean, why not have groups submit amici that clearly demonstrate the LEVEL of animus around this addtion to groups submitting amici rebutting all the other 'scientific' BS??!?

    legal minds, what u think?

  • 59. AndrewPDX  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:11 am

    Elizabeth, when I read <cite>…a bigmouth lying political tool,</cite> I had a flashback to 9 to 5, though he was a sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot…. pretty close.

    Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

  • 60. AndrewPDX  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:17 am

    I'll betcha Olson & Boies are already hard at work lining up countering amicus briefs ('amici' still sounds weird… sounds like you're talking about Don Ameche) for each of these homophobic things, and I'll betcha each one will say something like: "… and since each and every single citation of [Hate group name here] is 100% false, there can be only one conclusion: they are only here to try to harm the LGBTQQIIA community…"

    I can't wait for our rebuttal… it's gonna be soo much fun :)

    Liberty, Equality, Fraternity

  • 61. Aaron  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:20 am

    i hope so! i trust olson and boies. the answering brief will be fun, i agree.

    amici is plural if i remmeber my latin correctly.

  • 62. Kathleen  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:20 am

    In the district court, the parties submitted briefs specifically to respond to the amicus briefs on the other side. You can see them here, #604 = Proponents'; #607 = Plaintiffs'

    I don't know if something similar is allowed in the appeals court. But if not, then perhaps the parties respond to them in the answer brief (plaintiffs') and reply brief (proponents).

  • 63. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:24 am

    LLB: You'd also have to have 2 fanatical parents who were in complete ageement about this Abort-the-Baby-Gay business.

    If such were the case, I wouldn't have an objection to ANY child being spared them.

  • 64. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:31 am

    Elizabeth: Re: CLOSET TOAD

    Mr. Toad of Toad Hall has stated he objects to this phrase. He acknowledges there are pictures out there on the net showing him in drag as a charwoman, but that the "disguise" was only undertaken so he could escape from jail.

    He claims he is not now, nor ever was, either a drag toad, or a homosexual.…/2008_03_2_sm.jpg

  • 65. Alan E.  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:31 am

    ‘amici’ still sounds weird… sounds like you’re talking about Don Ameche

    I think of pizza. we have a chain here called Amici's Pizza.

  • 66. Ray in MA  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:35 am

    And when they discover the Ann Colter Gene we can fight for new legal concept: "mandatory abortion".

  • 67. Linda  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:52 am

    His sexual orientation is irrelevent. The point is he is a power-hungry pervert who stands accused of taking advantage of young men who were looking to him for guidance and mentoring.

    It is quite possible for a man to molest or rape another man and not be gay. Rape has less to do with sexual attraction and more to do with power and control.

  • 68. Linda  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:55 am

    Is it not possible for GOProud to find a conservative/republican who doesn't hate gays?

    What, exactly, does GOProud have to be proud of? Their self-hatred?

  • 69. Straight Ally #3008  |  September 26, 2010 at 8:56 am


  • 70. Rhie  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:06 am

    At the anti-abortion: Bwuh? Most pro-choice people I know are also pro-gay.

  • 71. Rhie  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I know, right? And the Christian church in the US wonders why they have a PR problem…

  • 72. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:15 am

    Oh my goodness! Mr. Toad is using all his influence to wipe images of him in drag from the net! (Hence, my above link didn't work.)

    I think his people haven't got to this one yet, though:

  • 73. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:22 am

    The young men bringing the lawsuits against Bishop Long were 17 or 18, it says. I do not know how far back these "relationships" go…but being attracted to teenagers on the Bishop's part isn't the same as pedophilia.

  • 74. Carpool Cookie  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:25 am

    Can you test a fetus to see if it will pick up its room?

  • 75. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:35 am

    Oh, Cookie — I love you!

  • 76. truthspew  |  September 26, 2010 at 10:09 am

    So let me get this right, the 14th amendment only applies if your skin color happens to be brown. Otherwise, it doesn't apply according to Coulters arguments.

    So by the same logic, the 14th amendment does not apply to a corporation, seriously, how can a corporation be black?

    I'd love to see her worm her way out of that one.

  • 77. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 10:14 am

    "Are you kidding? I've killed the boss, you think they're not going to fire me for that?"

    Or something to that effect. I loved Lily Tomlin in that movie.

  • 78. Elizabeth Oakes  |  September 26, 2010 at 10:21 am

    I apologize for any offense to toads. I feel like Benjamin in "League of Gentlemen" now. (Obscure reference, sorry.)

    The other suggestions are quite good though–I wonder when the next hypocrisexual closet cockroach story will pop up in the press.

  • 79. JonT  |  September 26, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    Late subscribe. And I see Coulter is still the wackjob she's always been.

    Oh and Rick Jacobs? I hereby apologize for a post I made some time ago actually defending GOProud. JMG's name for them, 'Quislings' is quite appropriate :)

  • 80. Kate  |  September 26, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    Cockroaches – ha hah hahhhh

  • 81. wolfinlv  |  September 26, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    My problem with this is that people are saying he’s gay… HE isn’t gay he’s a pedophile and we need to stop with calling him gay. Several radio personalities are saying and now we find him being gay Wrong he is a pedophile just as much as the catholic priests that touched kids are PEDOPHILES!

  • 82. Ann S.  |  September 26, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    Or her opinions on anything else.

  • 83. Lora  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    I was thinking the exact same thing. Why in the world would they do that??

  • 84. Lora  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    "Stay classy, Coulter"

    ….does not compute.

  • 85. jimmy23  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    the gays might not like the way she says it, but please let me know how shes wrong about abortion of gay babies? i can see the anti-gay pro lifers make a quick exception. being pro life is fine, but its ALWAYS different when its YOU.

    shes also spot on about gays getting special rights…..and being rich. gays are equal and more well off. doubt me? go to palm springs for the weekend. i think 2 of 5 their city council members are gay!

  • 86. jimmy23  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    so being gay is a free-will choice or is it genetic?

  • 87. Kathleen  |  September 26, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Go to Beverly Hills. It's obvious all white people are millionaires. (rolling eyes)

  • 88. Ed-M  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @icapricorn #9 – The term "useful idiots" is right. So is the term "gay Nazis." The far right is very happy to have them around, until they pose a threat to the party structure or are no longer useful. Then the Long Knives are pulled out of their sheaths and thrust into them, just as they were on June 30, 1934.

  • 89. Ed-M  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    And "once they find the gay gene," guess who's performing the abortions.

    It won't be pro-choicers, I can tell you that…

  • 90. Ed-M  |  September 26, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    How about "pond scum?" Assuming the pond scum isn't insulted of course. Then it's back to the old standby: "hypocrite."

  • 91. Owen  |  September 26, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    LCR *wants* gay rights, despite the hypocritical things they do.

    GOProud doesn't even want things like marriage, if I'm not mistaken.

  • 92. Roger  |  September 26, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    A name for these people?

    Their Master has already given it to them — "whited sepulchres".

    27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.

    28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

    Matthew 23, verses 27, 28. (KJV)

  • 93. BK  |  September 26, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    Ha. :)

  • 94. Chris in Lathrop  |  September 26, 2010 at 10:51 pm

    the gays “ought to start being antiabortion because “once they find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted”

    Just goes to show what a barbarian Coulter really is. Pro-Choice parents aren't nearly so likely to be homophobes as anti-abortionists, so take heart!

  • 95. elliom  |  September 27, 2010 at 1:56 am

    Where's the rat poison I can confuse for "Skinny and Sweet?"

  • 96. Ronnie  |  September 27, 2010 at 2:58 am

    Hahahahah spouting out gays have, get, a want special rights….& they are already equal & more well off…..& how the F@#K do you know?… do know that there is a whole lot more country out there then Palm Springs you half-wit?….No we are not treated Equally even though we pay the taxes & our parents pay the taxes to be treated equally….we do not have, get or want special rights….it is Fascist heterosexuals (mostly "Christian" who have, get & are demanding special rights)….so stpo with your half-brained excuses & what not…nobody's buying it….. X ( ….Ronnie

  • 97. GOProud, AKA what happens&hellip  |  September 27, 2010 at 11:11 am

    […] about GOProud that we thought might be a good follow-up to Jeremy’s post yesterday about GOProud’s “Homocon” event with Ann Coulter. — […]

Having technical problems? Visit our support page to report an issue!