Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed
×

Reaction to yesterday’s Perry hearings at the 9th Circuit

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Prop 8 trial

By Jacob Combs

Yesterday was quite the day at the 9th Circuit.  Despite a late start, an old courtroom and a less-than-reliable live stream (we’re still very grateful to KQED for making the live stream happen at all!), it was a good day for our side.  Here’s a roundup of the reaction to the trial in the news and across the blogosphere, with a little of our own analysis thrown into the mix.

  • First up in yesterday’s hearings was the issue of releasing the tapes.  The good news is that all three judges seemed quite skeptical of the Prop 8 side’s argument that releasing the recordings would result in any harm or harassment to the witnesses who testified.  The bad news is that they also seemed hesitant to release the tapes because Judge Walker informed both parties in the case that he was making the recordings for his own private use.  While the lawyers on our side argued that the recordings had been entered into the record without an objection by both sides, and that they don’t differ from any other recording of the trial such as a transcript, the panel seemed wary of making the tapes public when Walker said they were for his own use.  This panel certainly likes to play devil’s advocate with both sides, so this one could come down either way.  Don’t be surprised, though, if the tapes remain sealed.
  • On the second count regarding the motion to dismiss Judge Walker’s ruling, yesterday’s hearings could not have been more revealing.  Judge Smith (the only Republican appointee on the panel) grilled the proponents’ lawyer, Charles Cooper, ripping apart the argument that Judge Walker should have recused himself because of his sexuality and relationship status.  The judges had some questions for our side, but for the most part they let David Boies talk freely and eloquently about the rights of minority judges, and the importance of assuming a judge’s impartiality as opposed to making assumptions that ascribe some specific bias.  You can find the recordings of the hearings on the 9th Circuit’s website (audio is here and here), and Boies’ speech is definitely a part worth experiencing.
  • Towleroad has an interesting roundup of yesterday’s hearings, including a story in the Washington Post describing Judge Smith’s smack down of Charles Cooper as well as an opinion piece by Ruth Marcus arguing that it’s time for Obama to finish ‘evolving’ on marriage equality:

In a memorandum to Democratic consultants and campaign managers, gay rights advocates argue that backing same-sex marriage is not the political poison it was in years past. Indeed, they contend, it could be a political boon — not only with Democrats but with independent voters, some 56 percent of whom approve of same-sex marriage.

Their data? Analysis by Joel Benenson, Obama’s pollster, and Jan van Lohuizen, who served that role for George W. Bush.

  • The Los Angeles Times has an article analyzing yesterday’s hearings, as well as another about the passing of Ed Watson, which Adam wrote about earlier.  The New York Times also has coverage of the trial, as does the San Jose Mercury News.
  • The Huffington Post has an eloquent piece about Ed by Jamie McGonnigal titled “He Died Waiting to Get Married.”
The general consensus is that the motion to vacate will be rejected and the tapes will probably remain under seal.  With these arguments out of the way, the panel can now make its rulings on the merits.  Now, of course, the waiting game continues.  The panel could release its decision at any point in time, and given that it has had a year to consider the constitutional arguments in the case, we hope it won’t take too long to come to a decision.

38 Comments

  • 1. peterplumber  |  December 9, 2011 at 9:06 am

    I would gladly trade my ability to view the tapes for my ability to marry my long term partner.

  • 2. Sagesse  |  December 9, 2011 at 9:14 am

    @

  • 3. TomTallis  |  December 9, 2011 at 9:16 am

    I believe that they also need to formally rule on the standing issue before they can procede to the merits, unless I've missed something.

    Everyone seems to think that it's a foregone conclusion, but is it really?

  • 4. Alan_Eckert  |  December 9, 2011 at 9:18 am

    #

  • 5. Jacob Combs  |  December 9, 2011 at 9:38 am

    I don't think it's a foregone conclusion, but I don't think they would necessarily have to issue a separate ruling regarding standing. In other words, they could just have the one ruling, which would start out with the decision and reasoning on standing, and if it found they did have standing, would then go on to address the constitutional merits.

  • 6. Jamie Ward  |  December 9, 2011 at 10:04 am

    I don't think it's a foregone conclusion. I think it will be very difficult for the 9th Circuit to come up with anything that supports proponents having standing under federal jurisdiction, and even harder to come up with something that the Supreme Court is likely to buy.

  • 7. Straight Dave  |  December 9, 2011 at 10:31 am

    Ditto.
    However, I believe the 9th really desperately is dying to rule on the merits and will somehow find a way. I think they will try to exploit the loophole left by SCOTUS in Arizonans where they said something like "we are unaware of any Arizona state law that authorizes initiative proponents to appeal". The 9th now has the CASC ruling to point to and claim is good enough, and if SCOTUS wants to go ahead and overrule them, so be it. It's not like the 9th is shy about getting shot down – happens all the time.

    If SCOTUS wants to jump in with both feet and affirm this decision on the merits, they certainly have a good case with lots of evidence to back them up. But if they don't quite have the balls for it this time around, they have the easy out of the proponents not suffering any particularized harm. I'd bet money they bail out on standing rather than kill this case on the merits.

    At least we''re finally getting somewhere with this thing, but I can't imaging before January.

  • 8. Prop 8 OVERTURNED: Gay Ma&hellip  |  December 9, 2011 at 11:27 am

    […] sounds like except on the videotape issue, the court was very skeptical of the Prop h8 proponents: Prop 8 Trial Tracker Reaction to yesterday’s Perry hearings at the 9th Circuit Judges Seem Skeptical of Bias by Walker in Prop. 8 Hearing | News | The Advocate Prop 8 Trial […]

  • 9. Str8Grandmother  |  December 9, 2011 at 11:27 am

    The Videos are now available on line of the arguments before the Cout of Appeals. I would suggest a seperate article so it is easy for people to find this http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/?m_mode=view&am

  • 10. Fr. Bill  |  December 9, 2011 at 11:52 am

    I thought for a stay to be justified in Federal practice the requesting party need to show probable judgment in its favor and immediate significant harm, I doubt if they can show prpbablility of winning on the merits and yesterday conceded that no one's marriage is harmed by letting same gender marriage take place. So what would be the 9thCircuit's justification for keeping the stay in place? If anything, Ed Watson's death shows the irreparable harm done by keeping a stay in place.

    Ed will be remembered at services next Sunday here n Maui.

  • 11. DaveP  |  December 9, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    Thanks! I'm watching them now on my lunch break…..

  • 12. johnfromco  |  December 9, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    Wow, watching Cooper try arguing that the law was applied wrong by Judge Ware. Pretty amazing – even I know that an appeal typically doesn't question determination of fact, just application of law. Yet Cooper's argument seems to be "I disagree with Ware's determination of fact." I'm embarrassed for Mr. Cooper. It almost makes me want to help him out. That's just sad.

    And, "[We have] no direct evidence" is the best quote so far. If that doesn't sum everything up…

    Of course this is all the side-show. The real issue is whether or not people can marry? I wish they would get on with it!

  • 13. Keith  |  December 9, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    I think they're hoping for us to all die off before they are forced to rule. Waiting so long is a complete lack of justice for everyone that's harmed by Prop 8. I have no faith in our justice system.

  • 14. Keith  |  December 9, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    It will be another year before they will rule and then they will stay their ruling until it's appealed to the SCOTUS and that will take another 5 years. This whole process is a joke. I thought our justice system was supposed to be swift? How long do those being harmed have to wait for justice?

  • 15. Prop 8 Trial Tracker &raq&hellip  |  December 9, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    […] to Stra8Grandmother in the comments from my earlier piece for pointing out that the video of yesterday’s hearings is now available on the 9th […]

  • 16. Jamie  |  December 9, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    me neither

  • 17. fighting sascha!  |  December 9, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    Justice?system?where? the US justice lives behind the moon!!!no equality ,people being stoped to be happy,is it our fault to love who ever we want?why do we get punished for that?i see my girlfriend 5-6 months(binational couple) a year because of the slow working justice in this weird organized country…geez
    what a shame….

  • 18. Alex  |  December 9, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    CASC actually doesn't cite any law. Their standing on ruling only seems to be based on "fairness".

  • 19. Alex  |  December 9, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    Their ruling on standing*

  • 20. Prop 8 Trial Tracker &raq&hellip  |  February 6, 2012 at 6:45 pm

    […] 8 hearing on the motion to overturn Judge Walker’s decision, the 9th Circuit panel seemed deeply skeptical that Judge Walker’s ruling should be thrown out because of his orientation and relationship […]

  • 21. Prop 8 Trial Tracker &raq&hellip  |  February 7, 2012 at 10:07 am

    […] 8 hearing on the motion to overturn Judge Walker’s decision, the 9th Circuit panel seemed deeply skeptical that Judge Walker’s ruling should be thrown out because of his orientation and relationship […]

  • 22. Anonymous  |  January 20, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    That is really attention-grabbing, You’re an excessively professional blogger.
    I’ve joined your rss feed and stay up for looking for more
    of your magnificent post. Additionally, I have shared your web site in my social networks

  • 23. www.youtube.com  |  February 5, 2014 at 7:35 am

    Thanks for every other excellent article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information iin such an ideal way of writing?
    I have a presentation subsequent week, and I amm at the look for shch info.

    Feel free to surf to my blog post :: ocksmith company In nashville (http://www.youtube.com)

  • 24. Optimizepress - Find Out The Truth  |  March 3, 2014 at 10:50 pm

    Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed
    to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they just do not
    know about. You managed to hit the nail
    upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having
    side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to
    get more. Thanks

  • 25. realistic results  |  April 9, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested
    to see if it can survive a 30 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation.
    My iPad is now broken and she has 83 views.
    I know this is totally off topic but I had
    to share it with someone!

  • 26. .223 ammo for sale  |  April 17, 2014 at 3:11 pm

    It is truly a nice and helpful piece of information.
    I’m satisfied that you shared this helpful info with us.

    Please keep uss informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

    My blog post – .223 ammo for sale

  • 27. buy ammo online  |  April 18, 2014 at 4:45 am

    Good day! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest authoring a blog article
    or vice-versa? My blog discusses a lot of the same topics as yours
    and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other.
    If you happen to be interested feel free to sernd me an e-mail.
    I look forward to hearing from you! Awesome blkg by the way!

    Feel free to visit my blog post buy ammo online

  • 28. how to hack a twitter account  |  April 20, 2014 at 7:22 am

    Actually no matter if someone doesn’t know
    after that its up to other visitors that they will help, so here it occurs.

  • 29. Anonymous  |  April 28, 2014 at 4:10 pm

    You have made some really good points there. I checked on the web for more information about the issue and found most individuals will go along
    with your views on this web site.

    Here is my homepage; Paddy o

  • 30. Clarence Richardson  |  April 28, 2014 at 4:53 pm

    Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.
    Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate?

    My weblog Clarence Richardson

  • 31. Annie Lopez  |  April 28, 2014 at 5:08 pm

    That is really interesting, You are an overly professional blogger.
    I’ve joined your feed and stay up for in search of more of your wonderful post.
    Also, I have shared your site in my social networks

    Here is my web blog … Annie Lopez

  • 32. Aaron Griffin  |  April 28, 2014 at 6:54 pm

    Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact used to be a enjoyment account
    it. Look complicated to more introduced agreeable from you!
    By the way, how can we communicate?

    Feel free to surf to my homepage Aaron Griffin

  • 33. Lois Thompson  |  April 30, 2014 at 10:15 am

    Your method of describing the whole thing in this article
    is truly good, every one be able to without difficulty be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

    Also visit my website: Lois Thompson

  • 34. Halley  |  April 30, 2014 at 1:27 pm

    It’s awesome designed for me to have a web site, which is useful
    in favor of my knowledge. thanks admin

    Feel free to visit my blog post; Faye Crawford – Halley

  • 35. Winifred  |  April 30, 2014 at 5:06 pm

    Wow! After all I got a blog from where I be capable of genuinely take useful data concerning my study and knowledge.

    Review my web page :: Paddy oBrian [Winifred]

  • 36. Annie Lopez  |  April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm

    Hi there to every , for the reason that I am
    actually keen of reading this web site’s post to be updated regularly.
    It consists of pleasant information.

    Here is my homepage Annie Lopez

  • 37. Andy Harrison  |  May 2, 2014 at 3:34 pm

    Great beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your site, how could i subscribe
    for a blog website? The account aided me a applicable deal.

    I had been tiny bit familiar of this your broadcast offered vivid clear idea

    Here is my blog – Andy Harrison

  • 38. ammo for sale  |  May 20, 2014 at 5:07 am

    Unquestionably consider that which you stated.Your favorite reason appeared to be at the net the easiest factor tto
    be mindful of. I say to you, I certainly get irke while peoplee think about issues that they just
    do not realize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as neatly as outlined out the entire
    thing without having side effect , other folks could take a signal.
    Will probably be bak to get more. Thank you

    Also visit my web page :: ammo for sale

Having technical problems? Visit our support page to report an issue!