Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed

Supreme Court grants extension for House Republicans’ response to Justice Department’s petition for review in DOMA cases

DOMA trials

By Scottie Thomaston

There are currently three petitions for certiorari to the Supreme Court in challenges to Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act: Gill v. OPM/Massachusetts v. HHS, Golinski v. OPM, and Windsor v. USA. One of those petitions (Gill) was filed by the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) who stepped in to defend DOMA; the rest were filed by the Justice Department. Responses to the petitions were due on Thursday of this week, but BLAG asked the Supreme Court for an extension of time to file their responses.

According to Chris Geidner:

Lawyers for the House Republican leaders, who are going to court to defend the law that bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, asked for a delay to file their responses up “to and including Aug. 31, 2012.” Acting through their majority on the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, they sought the additional time to respond to the requests made by the Obama administration and the American Civil Liberties Union for the court to hear other challenges to DOMA.

The deadline extension, which lawyers familiar with the cases say could cause up to a one-week delay in when in the fall the Supreme Court justices would consider when to take the cases, won’t likely have any long-term effect on how and when the cases might be considered by the justices.

Assuming that the extension is granted, however, the new deadline would mean that House Speaker John Boehner’s lawyers would get a chance to take aim at the Obama administration, which stopped defending DOMA in early 2011, following the conclusion of the Republican National Convention on Aug. 30 and before the start of the Democratic National Convention the next week.

Parties to cases before the Supreme Court routinely ask for more time to file briefs. The Supreme Court often grants these extensions. The request and tee decision to grant the delay are not necessarily controversial and do not necessarily foretell anything about the case. And as Geidner notes, the only real effect it may have is to push things back a week or so.


  • 1. chris hogan  |  July 31, 2012 at 3:38 pm

    Anti-gay side: Oh, if only we could delay the inevitable forever!

  • 2. Kathleen  |  July 31, 2012 at 3:39 pm

    1) While parties are seeking cert in three different DOMA cases (if you count Mass and Gill as one), there are actually 5 different petitions – one each in Windsor and Golinski and three in the Mass DOMA cases (DOJ, BLAG, Commonwealth of Mass).
    2) The DOJ isn't asking for cert in Windsor. The plaintiff Edith Windsor filed that petition.

  • 3. Mike in Baltimore  |  July 31, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    Even though "Geidner notes [ ] the only real effect it may have is to push things back a week or so", it definitely will remain in the subconscious of the justices, and will almost certainly make SCOTUS, even if a tad bit, more suspicious of what BLAG states. It might not make any real difference, but BLAG is definitely NOT going to win any 'brownie' points.

    I don't know if or how it could be constructed, but I'd like to see a study undertaken to see if asking for a delay, any type of delay for any reason, in a case that appears to be close causes the questioning of that party to be changed at the oral hearing. Even if the justices don't intend to do so, there may be some subtle and almost unnoticeable changes.

    The justices ARE human, after all.

  • 4. steven  |  July 31, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    just legalize it in california so gay lesbian bisexual transgenders get married me my fiance goin get married in sacramento weather judges deny we get married have family i am one getting married my fiance

  • 5. Larry  |  August 1, 2012 at 5:56 am

    Oh, those poor Republicans! They're so busy trying to pass anti-abortion bills, anti-Obamacare bills, and cutting spending for infrastructure, teachers, and first responders that they don't have enough time to keep BLAG going, too.

  • 6. Prop 8 Trial Tracker &raq&hellip  |  September 10, 2012 at 10:02 am

    […] tasked with defending Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act on behalf of House Republicans, was granted an extension to file responses to all the petitions for certiorari to the Supreme Court, until August 31. The […]

Having technical problems? Visit our support page to report an issue!