Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed

Filed under: Transgender Rights

Repeal of California law protecting transgender student rights fails to qualify for November ballot

Repeal of transgender rights law fails to qualify for California ballot.

Continue 14 Comments February 25, 2014

Trans women win North Carolina legal challenges surrounding name changes

The women had challenged a law from the 1800s the prevented them from obtaining legal documents with their preferred names.

Continue 5 Comments February 24, 2014

New Jersey takes one step forward on marriage equality, one step back on trans rights

Gov. Christie–who vetoed the state’s marriage equality bill in 2012–this week vetoed a transgender rights bill as well.

Continue 14 Comments January 17, 2014

Anti-LGBT group submits signatures for ballot measure to overturn transgender protections

A new ballot initiative push in California features some old players–and, likely, some old tactics.

Continue 35 Comments November 12, 2013

CA governor approves transgender birth certificate legislation

Another victory for trans-inclusive policies in California.

Continue 4 Comments October 11, 2013

Employee wins $50,000 settlement after facing anti-transgender discrimination

Lambda Legal and the Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) reached a $50,000 settlement over an employment discrimination dispute involving an employee, Cori McCreery, who is transgender. McCreery was fired from her job at a grocery store after she announced her intent to begin the process of transitioning:

According to Lambda, McCreery was initially given assurances she’d have job security after she announced she’d transition, but was swiftly fired after being told she was “making other employees uncomfortable” and the company had a “7 million dollar investment to protect.”

The $50,00 amount is the highest anyone can receive for damages under the law.

The decision follows Lambda Legal’s and the EEOC’s previous work on anti-transgender employment discrimination. The EEOC held in the Macy case that anti-transgender discrimination is sex discrimination. At least two more EEOC rulings followed from that.

Lambda Legal notes some of the history behind the recent EEOC cases:

The Macy decision relied heavily upon Lambda Legal’s ground-breaking 2008 victory in the Eleventh Circuit on behalf of Vandy Beth Glenn, a legislative editor who was fired from her job with the Georgia General Assembly office after announcing her intent to transition from male to female at work.

The EEOC, in their press release for the new settlement, said there has been a “steady stream” of court decisions validating their approach:

In addition to the EEOC’s recent decision on sex discrimination, Macy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120821 (April 20, 2012), there has been a steady stream of district court decisions finding that claims of discrimination based on transgender status, also referred to as gender identity, are cognizable under Title VII’s sex discrimination prohibition.

“Employers need to be made aware that their personal myths, fears, and stereotypes about gender identity can subject them to liability if they act upon them in an employment setting,” said Julie Schmid, acting director of the EEOC’s Minneapolis Area Office.

EEOC Commissioner Chai Feldblum said, “Individuals need to be treated on their merits. I am glad that EEOC staff was available to help this hard-working individual.”

McCreery now works at a company that scores 100% on HRC’s Corporate Equality Index.

September 17, 2013

Previous page