Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed
×

Marriage equality bill to receive full Washington House vote at 1 p.m.

Marriage equality

By Jacob Combs

Following yesterday’s historic news of the 9th Circuit striking down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional, today brings another monumental event for marriage equality: the Washington House is scheduled to vote on a marriage equality bill at 1 p.m. PST.  The bill passed the state Senate last Wednesday on a 28-21 vote, with four Republican senators voting in favor of the measure.

According to The Olympian, Democratic Rep. Jamie Pederson believes there are 54 to 56 votes in the House to pass the bill, significantly more than the 49-vote majority needed to approve the bill.  Observers have expected the bill to easily pass the House, and Governor Chris Gregoire has pledged to sign it into law.  That law would take effect on June 7.

You can watch tomorrow’s House proceedings live on TVW, Washington’s state version of C-SPAN.  And, of course, we’ll have the news here on Prop8TrialTracker.com when it breaks!

27 Comments

  • 1. Sagesse  |  February 8, 2012 at 9:07 am

    @

  • 2. chris from CO  |  February 8, 2012 at 9:28 am

    What a great month this will turn out to be. This will keep the news on us for a little while. That could help our cause.

  • 3. chris from CO  |  February 8, 2012 at 10:02 am

    After Washington passes marriage equality. Supporters to ban same-sex marriage will petition to have a vote on the ballot. Since Washington is part of the 9th can the ballot initiative be dropped because it is declared unconstitutional or is it required to go to the ballot and be dealt with threw the courts later?

  • 4. EricKoszyk  |  February 8, 2012 at 10:53 am

    Unfortunately, what happened in CA is not the same as what could potentially happen in Washington.

    In CA, Prop 8 took away marriage rights that gays and lesbians had, after the CA State Supreme Court ruled that Prop 22 was unconstitutional and granted them that right. That Prop 8 took away rights is the focus of the 9th's narrow ruling.

    In WA, gays and lesbians do not currently have the right to marry.

    When Governor Gregoire signs the marriage equality bill into law, it will not take effect until June 7th. The opponents of marriage equality have until June 6 to submit a petition with 120,577 signatures to the Secretary of States office.

    If they turn in signatures prior to the deadline, the law is suspended until signatures can be verified. If not enough signatures are turned in, then the law takes effect immediately. If enough signatures are turned in then the law is suspended until the results of the November election are certified, on December 6. If the referendum fails ( a "Yes" vote is in favor of the new law), then the law is rejected and gays and lesbians still cannot marry.

    The referendum does not take pre-existing rights away (like Prop 8 did), it takes new rights away before they are given.
    http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/whats-next-for

    Everything you want to know about the referendum process:
    http://blogs.secstate.wa.gov/FromOurCorner/

  • 5. steven  |  February 8, 2012 at 10:12 am

    After governor signs the bill somebody needs to file a lawsuit and use 9th circuit's finding..

  • 6. chiefscribe  |  February 8, 2012 at 10:43 am

    Anybody see this in-depth piece on Maggie Gallagher in Salon? Interesting but sad to see how someone's bitterness gets projected into a national movement against other people's rights. http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/the_making_of_gay

  • 7. fiona64  |  February 8, 2012 at 11:16 am

    Brief summary: Maggie Gallagher answers to "Bitter, party of one."

  • 8. Brett  |  February 8, 2012 at 10:53 am

    It's wonderful to see diversity winning in so many ways this month. I think MLK and other civil rights leaders would be proud.

  • 9. Brad M  |  February 8, 2012 at 11:18 am

    In Illinois, a Marriage Equality bill was filed in the IL General Assembly today!
    http://eqil.org/cmsdocuments/Media_release_Feb_8_

  • 10. CalCub  |  February 8, 2012 at 11:53 am

    So I'm curious, is Governor Gregoire required to sign the legislation immediately after it passes? Can she hold off for an indefinite amount of time to "Fully consider the ramifications of her signing the legislation"? Maybe sit on it for a month or two, thus making the window for NOM and thier battalions of HIRED professional signature gatherers task to get to 120,600 signatures that much more unattainable? Yeah I know it's a shifty tactic, but on the other hand, having witnessed first hand the deplorable methods NOM used here in CA back in 2008, including fear mongering and blatant lies to possible signatories, I think it's only fair. Tit for tat!

  • 11. Eric Koszyk  |  February 8, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    Nope, she has 5 days. That's it.
    http://blogs.secstate.wa.gov/FromOurCorner/

  • 12. Lesbians Love Boies  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    I actually wouldn't worry about them gathering their votes (even if they get enough) they will LOSE no matter what.

  • 13. Jacob  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    Wow, is anyone watching the Washington legislature? They're a model of efficiency.

  • 14. James A. Tuttle  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    Right!?? I was thinking the same thing…New york was much slower.

  • 15. gayathomemom  |  February 8, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    Watching now… the no votes sound like a bunch of narrow-minded religious morons. No logic, no emotion, no sense.

  • 16. James A. Tuttle  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    YES!!!! Amendment to put marriage to a vote FAILS!!!

  • 17. Carpool Cookie  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    Thanks for the report. Will research this later.

    Fab news if I'm understanding you correctly!

  • 18. James A. Tuttle  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    yes, you are. The residents are still allowed to gather signatures and such as per the referendum system but there is no built in amendment that a vote will happen automatically. I've seen role call votes on about 6 amendments now and the R's have lost all of them.

  • 19. Owen  |  February 8, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    Ugh, I start watching and pick up in the middle of this Rodne blathering about procreation and the same tired arguments we've heard for ages.

  • 20. Jon  |  February 8, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    The bill passes 55 to 43!

  • 21. El Segundo seo packages for small business  |  April 9, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    Unquestionably believe that which you stated.
    Your favorite justification appeared to be on the internet the simplest thing to
    be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries
    that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a
    signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  • 22. .223 ammo for sale  |  April 17, 2014 at 3:19 pm

    It’s enormous that you are getting ideas from this article as well as from our dialogue made aat this time.

    My blog post … .223 ammo for sale

  • 23. bullets for sale  |  April 17, 2014 at 6:28 pm

    Wow! This blog looks just like mmy old one!

    It’s on a totally different topic but it has pretty much the same layout and design.
    Great choice of colors!

    Allso visit my page; bullets for sale

  • 24. .22 ammo for sale  |  April 17, 2014 at 11:05 pm

    For most recent news you have to goo tto see world-wide-web and on internet I found this web site as a best site for most up-to-date updates.

    My blog post .22 ammo for sale

  • 25. ammo for sale  |  April 18, 2014 at 2:24 am

    Your way of telling the whnole thing in this article is truly nice, all be able to without difficulty be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

    Also visit mmy webpage; ammo for sale

  • 26. Anonymous  |  April 28, 2014 at 4:59 pm

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your
    point. You clearly know what youre talking about,
    why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos
    to your blog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

    Look at my site: Paddy o

  • 27. Laura Ramirez  |  April 29, 2014 at 11:37 am

    This text is worth everyone’s attention. Where can I find out more?

    My web site … Laura Ramirez

Having technical problems? Visit our support page to report an issue!